Analysis of an Argument - Toothpaste

Analysis of an Argument

"Two of today's top-selling brands of whitening toothpaste,ShinyWhite and SparkleDent, are now available in extra-strength form. Dentists promote the use of regular-strength ShinyWhite 50% more than they promote the use of regular-strength SparkleDent, so people who want an effective whitening toothpaste in extra-strength form should choose ShinyWhite."

The argument is flawed in its conclusion to promote extra-strength SparkleDent based on the certification given to regular-strength SparkleDent. The argument is not comparing two things of same quality. Also, the argument retorts to the appeal of authority to substantiate its initial statement that regular-strength SparkleDent is better than regular-strength ShinyWhite.

The pamphlet does not provide the features or concrete test results between the performance of extra-strength ShinyWhite to that of SparkleDent. There is no evidence that these two toothpastes will perform the same way at different quality levels. Also, the recommendation should be personalized to different types of people. Some may not withstand an extra-strength toothpaste. For them, a statutory warning should be given as to what problems may occur due to an extra-strength toothpaste.

The pamphlet refers to the promotion of dentists who recommend the use of regular-strength ShinyWhite to that of SparkleDent. The pamphlet does not give any specifications about those doctors like their medical association affiliation, recognition by the government and the sampling is confined to a particular locality or does it talks about the country as a whole.

A certified doctor's association, which is accepted by both ShinyWhite and SparkleDent, should perform valid and concrete tests under different quantitative and qualitative levels. The tests should be done over adequate number of times to prevent any sampling error. Then the performance of these two tooth-pastes should be compared. With proper test results for regular and extra-strength category, the general public would be sane enough to choose themselves the toothpaste they would like to use.



You can rate this essay in the comments section on the scale of 0 to 6.

Analysis of an issue - Good vs Bad employee ?

Analysis of an issue

"The most important quality in an employee is not educational background or job proficiency; instead, the desire to be a part of a team separates a good employee from a bad employee."

A good employee is expected to have the right mix of education and interpersonal skills. Interpersonal skills are as important as the educational qualifications. However, interpersonal should not be taken as a lone factor in determining if an employee is good or bad. The important quality of an employee is how he optimizes his available skill set to add value to his employer's business.
Every employee starts afresh at some point in their career. As they progress through their career, they learn through experience. This experience adds value and polish the skills of the employee. The success of every employee is measure on the value he adds to the business of his employer over his tenure. Being academically strong or having good interpersonal skills alone wont be sufficient to bring out the result. The employee should be dynamic, motivated and be alert to the changes. To have these qualities one should be adept in learning from one's past experience. Right mix of academic and vocational skills helps an employee to achieve it. The importance of a skill may differ from job to job. An employee of aero science or nuclear science will be expected to be more proficient in his academic than his interpersonal skills. May be marketing managers should be more adept with his interpersonal skills than his academic credentials.
The employee should be able to look inside himself to identify the qualities he has, accept his weakness and try to optimize his skill sets so that he could be more productive. This quality of learning from the past successes and mistakes would be an important quality that would help him to sustain throughout his career as a good employee.

Analysis of an argument - Sales decline

Analysis of an argument

"The decrease in revenues that the company is experiencing coincides with declining automobile sales. This decline is due, in part, to a greater demand for energy-efficient vehicles that is not currently being met. Consider also that the manager of the department that handles research and development of energy-efficient parts does not have the background in either engineering or science. Therefore, the company should move the current research and development manager to another department, and bring in an engineer to fill the position."


The argument is flawed that the decline in automobile sales can be attributed to other factors apart from the demand of energy-efficient vehicles. Greater demand for energy-efficient vehicles is just a part of the cause. Also, there may be other companies that could provide energy-efficient vehicle parts. The report talks as if the company under consideration holds a monopoly over the energy-efficient vehicle parts which is not substantiated at all. Attributing the inefficiency of the company to meet demand for energy-efficient part to the decline in auto sales is flawed.
The report also asks for the transfer of manger taking only current report into consideration. The report does not talk about the past achievements of the manager. Also, it assumes that a manager who holds a degree in science or engineering would be more competent. However, it does not aver to the basic qualification of having expertise in energy-efficient vehicle parts.
the report does not talk about the quality of the energy-efficient vehicle parts, It does not refer to the quality being inferior. A research and development manager is accountable only to the quality and the sophistication of the product. Materials procurement, production and inventory management should be attributed to a production manager. So the request to transfer the current manager to another department is unreasonable and totally unjustified.

Analysis of an argument - Highway expansion

Analysis of an argument

"In addition last year of two lanes to the existing Highway 41 business loop in Hortonville was a mistake. Since the addition of lanes, arrests for traffic violations in downtown Hortonville have increased, and the homes located adjacent to the highway have decreased in value. Watertown should pay close attention to the example of Hortonville and oppose the proposed expansion of highway in Watertown."


The argument is flawed that its conclusion does not follow the evidence provided. The newspaper alludes to the correlation between traffic violations and the addition of lanes without discussing about the process that was put in place for traffic management. It also does not provide adequate proof that the reduction in home rates is due to the traffic snarls.
Before drawing parallels between Watertown and Hortonville highway, we must compare if both of them are indeed similar situations. The newspaper does not provide the vital statistics like population of humans and vehicles, peak hour traffic and rate of traffic violations. We must consider these information before we ought to compare the situations of both the highways.
We must also consider the effort put on traffic regulation after the highway was expanded in Hortonville. The increase in traffic snarls can also be attributed to poor traffic regulation. Also, the argument that the value of homes have decreased due to traffic snarls is flawed that the assumption of correlation proves causation. No concrete data was presented to support this assumption.
The extension of highway of Watertown should be properly planned with the help of statistical data pertaining to human and traffic population and peak hour traffic. The care that goes into the implementation of the project should also be given to the enforcement of the traffic regulations once the project is over. With proper planning, implementation and enforcement, extension of Watertown highway can be a success.


You can rate this essay in the comments section on a scale of 1 to 6.